All Slots: the group award it really can claim
One of the few brands in our set that can point at a trophy, and it belongs to a company rather than to the site itself.
Ad disclosure: some casino links are affiliate links; we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never affects what a page says. 18+.

Alderney AGCC Category 1, Baytree (Alderney) Ltd · Kahnawake, Baytree Interactive Ltd
- 2008Casinomeister · Winner, Best Casino Group (to the group that then owned it)
18+ · Sponsored
A group award, written the way a group award has to be written
A trophy given to a company is a true statement about that company and a false one about any single website inside it, and the gap between the two is exactly one word long (the word is "group", and it is the whole of this page). This brand is one of the few here that can point at a real award, and only in the version that keeps the word.
The objection is obvious enough, since if the group won, then surely the site you are looking at won along with it. A group is not a website.
The two titles, and who received them
Verified in the award body's own page · To the same group, for the second year.
Verified in the award body's own page · To the group The Jackpot Factory, which then gathered All Slots, All Jackpots, First Web, Wild Jack and The VIP Lounge.
The 2007 and 2008 editions of the Casinomeister awards each produced a "Best Casino Group", and both went to The Jackpot Factory, which was then the owner of this brand (the ledger above repeats that fact beside each of the two years). Four other casinos sat in the same portfolio (Wild Jack, First Web, All Jackpots and The VIP Lounge), and the forum's own word for what it was judging was "group", so the judgement covered five sites at a time.
What the forum's membership was comparing matters as much as the result. It was weighing groups against groups, which means the winning entry says a portfolio was preferred to other portfolios; it says nothing whatever about how this particular address compared with the individual casinos of 2007.
So the honest sentence has a shape, and we have used the same shape in the ledger above: the group that then owned this brand was named "Best Casino Group" by Casinomeister in 2007 and once more in 2008. Any version that drops the words "the group" is making a claim the record does not support, and most of the versions in circulation drop them.
There is a further wrinkle, which is that the winning company no longer exists in the form that won. The Jackpot Factory's brands have since been gathered into the Palace group, which Super Group runs as its Spin division; the award is therefore best read as a statement about a 2008 portfolio, and not about anything a player would meet today.
The same pair of titles is also claimed, across many pages, by a casino whose name resembles the winning group's and which was never in it. We correct that on the page where it belongs, and it is worth knowing here too: two brands reach for these awards, and only one of them was in the group!
The companies behind it, and one licence we cannot print
Bayton Ltd of Malta has run the Palace group since 2001 (a portfolio, and not an address), and the company named on the regulators' own rolls is Baytree (Alderney) Ltd, under Alderney's "Category 1" entitlement (applied to an operating company, and not to a site). The domain allslotscasino.com appeared on the official register of Alderney licensees when we read it on 22 September 2026, which is the check that matters, because a group licence does not automatically cover every address a group operates, and because that register is searchable by domain, which is the search a reader actually needs.
The second arrangement runs through Kahnawake, where permit 00892 belongs to Baytree Interactive Ltd, a Guernsey company, and carries the date 16 February 2022. Several review sites mention a Malta licence as well; we could not establish which entity holds one or whether it covers this domain (no entity, no number, no list of domains), so it stays out of the box above rather than going in on somebody else's authority.
The numbers, and the one that stays out
On the numeric side the reading is modest and the band name says so without help from us. Seven point eight was the "Safety Index" reading at Casino Guru on 20 October 2026, a figure the portal keeps in an "Above average" band, and the complaint count behind it stood at twenty-two.
Casinomeister offers a second reading, and it is cooler than the first, since that portal keeps this brand in its "grey zone" and has never once accredited it (a status its rules grant only after a sixty-day trial). That assessment comes from the same body that handed the group its title in 2008, which gives a reader two dated documents from one source, eighteen years apart, pointing in different directions.
A third reading is missing, and we would rather print the hole than paper over it. We read no Trustpilot page for this brand at all (two domains were tried), so this page carries no public review average, and a figure borrowed from a similarly named domain would be worse than nothing.
One more number exists at Casino Guru and does not appear here, for a reason worth stating. That portal also publishes "black points" (a running tally of unresolved issues), but it adds the points a brand earns itself to those it inherits from casinos linked to it, and on the Palace brands between ninety and ninety-seven per cent of the total comes from the linked ones, which makes the headline figure unusable without a split we cannot perform, so the number a reader meets elsewhere is not the number this brand earned.
What the registers hold
Britain does not licence this brand, which is why the Commission's register has nothing to say about it in either direction. Across the Alderney and Kahnawake rolls we opened, no "regulatory action" was entered for either of the two companies (nothing licensed there, and so nothing recorded there).
How to read any award line in ten seconds
What this page leaves behind is a question about the recipient rather than about the prize, and it resolves most award claims in the time it takes you to read one. Ask who the forum, the magazine or the panel actually named as the "recipient" (the award body prints it, and the operator paraphrases it), and accept only three answers: a "brand", a "group", or a "named person".
Those three are different statements with different evidence behind them, and the pages that merge them are not so much careless as convenient (convenient for the operator, and not for you), which is why the ledger above keeps the three apart. On this page the answer is the middle one, it is true, and it is eighteen years old.
VisitMGA/CRP/258/2014, Videoslots Limited (Malta)
VisitAlderney AGCC Category 1, Baytree (Alderney) Ltd · Kahnawake, Baytree Interactive Ltd
VisitVirtual Digital Services Limited under MGA/CRP/121/2006, as the operator's own terms state · 888 UK Limited, Gambling Commission account 39028, in Britain
Visit All Slots Casino
Alderney AGCC Category 1, Baytree (Alderney) Ltd · Kahnawake, Baytree Interactive Ltd
Visit All Slots Casino18+ · Sponsored link · Terms on the operator's site
Questions
Can a brand claim its group's award?
It can state it, as long as it states it as a group award and names the group. What it cannot do is let a reader believe that a panel preferred this site over others, because that is not what happened.